The Efficiency of Grape Vinegar-Treated Eatables Against Gut Microbes

Introduction:

Two stages of fermentation result in vinegar (1,2). First, in anaerobic environments, yeast transforms fermentable carbohydrates into ethanol. Acetobacter bacteria, sometimes referred to as acetic acid bacteria (AAB) in aerobic circumstances, subsequently convert ethanol into acetic acid during the oxidation process (3). Although items with a high sugar content are the most frequently employed substrates for vinegar manufacture, alcohol, such as wine, can also be used (4,5). In addition to organic acids, vinegar also contains colouring agents, mineral salts, and other fermentation products. These ion products, which include aldehydes, ketones, and esters, give vinegar its unique flavour and scent (6). Many compounds with antioxidant qualities found in fruit vinegar, including wine vinegar, may have come from the fruit themselves, but their composition may alter as a result of acetic fermentation, such as an increase in the total flavonoid and total phenolic content. The phenolic components in vinegar affect its colour and astringency while also boosting its antioxidant activity. Oxygen availability and the makeup of the bacterial starting cultures can also affect the vinegar’s quality, as well as its chemical and sensory characteristics. It should be noted that the fermentation of vinegar is also an aerobic event, and that the growth of the bacteria involved depends on oxygen (7). The important role that gut microbiota plays in human health and illness has been the subject of several studies conducted all over the world (8). In the human body, a wide variety of bacteria, viruses, archaea, and unicellular eukaryotes live. The gastrointestinal system is home to a large number of microorganisms, but they are present on every surface of the human body. The gut microbiota can break down complex proteins, carbohydrates, and other components, making it essential for human digestion (9). The intestines are unable to absorb certain high molecular-weight foods. According to 10,11,12,13, and others, these drugs interact with gut microbiota and can change the makeup and function of the intestinal microbiome, which in turn affects gut metabolism and overall health. In the microbiome, gram-positive Firmicutes and gram-negative bacteria are the most common types. The bacteroidetes(14). It has been demonstrated recently that the microbiota can be successfully separated into many enterotypes, each of which is enriched by specific bacterial species, yet they all appear to have a high degree of functional continuity (16). This homogeneity is present irrespective of host characteristics, including nationality, age, sex, and body mass index (17). A key factor in both health and sickness is the host-microbe relationship. A person’s food, lifestyle, age, and surroundings all have a significant impact on the diversity of their gut microbiota. However, according to (18), one of the main factors (modifiers) influencing gut microbiota is now thought to be food. Numerous studies have substantiated the idea that gut microbiota is important in regulating immunity, energy balance, weight gain or loss, and diseases associated with obesity (19). Grape vinegar improves carbohydrate metabolism by lowering blood levels of haemoglobin A1c and fasting glucose, as well as postprandial glycemia. By lowering the levels of total cholesterol and LDL fraction, grape vinegar has been shown to have a favourable impact on the lipid profile. The average person eats a variety of vegetables regularly, such as raw papaya, green chillies, white radish, ginger, garlic, and onions. A variety of medicinal benefits are inherent in garlic. The ethnopharmaceutical herb garlic is known to contain an organosulfur component called allicin, which inhibits the formation of lipids (20).

Material and Methods:

Sample preparation:Purchased from the local market in Bijnor, India (U.P.), all of the chosen veggies (ginger, garlic, onion, raw papaya, green chilli, and white radish) were scrubbed to get rid of dirt, peeled, and then washed again under running water. Each of these veggies was sliced into little bits and placed in the grape vinegar (Fig. 1), followed by washing and sun-drying for two to four hours. This process takes seven to ten days to use in future research and extractions. All materials should be thoroughly pulverised using a vinegar filter with filter paper and kept at room temperature in sterile glass jars for future testing.

Qualitative Analysis of Selected Vegetables and GrapeVinegar:Using the AOAS technique (1990), as defined by 21 and 22 qualitative standard chemical tests,was undertaken for a phytochemical screening of grape vinegar-shocked vegetables, unshocked vegetables, and grape vinegar. Alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, anthraquinones, terpenoids, and glycosides were all found by these assays.

Antimicrobial activity by agar well diffusion method:Aerococcussuis, Bifidobacteriumdentium, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus formosensis, and Lactobacillus agilis were among the gut microorganisms against which the antimicrobial activity spectra of five chosen isolates were analysed using an agar well diffusion experiment. 100 µl of pathogenic bacterial cultures that were 24 hours old were swabbed onto Muller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates from nutrient broth, and a sterile cock borer was then used to create a well. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours after 20µl of each extract’s supernatant was placed in a well. After measuring the inhibition zones’ diameters, the mean diameter of the inhibition zones was determined.The agar well diffusion assay has the advantage of allowing us to put more samples into a well at once, unlike loading a disc. In the well-diffusion approach, the capacity of the phytocompound to diffuse over the agar is essential. One can measure the zone of inhibition using a template, a set of callipers, or a ruler. Measured in millimetres, its dimensions are usually rounded to the next millimetre. It also gives the diameter of the well. Using the naked eye, these measures are taken without the use of any instruments.

Result and Discussion:The examination of various phytochemical bioactive chemicals in grape vinegar and the impact of particular gut microorganisms on particular vegetables are the primary goals of this study. The many phytochemical components of grapevinegar, including proteins, carbohydrates, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, glycosides, terpenoids, and anthraquinones, have been examined in this study (Table 1) and are bioactive substances that are highly advantageous to human health. Anthraquinones are not present in grape vinegar, but when some eatables are soaked with grape vinegar for 7 days,theyshow a positive result. Phytochemicals are substances that naturally occur in plants and are also referred to as phytonutrients. These compounds have antioxidant properties and are good for human health. Alkaloids found in plants are used as anaesthetics in medications. This study demonstrates that vinegar-based food extract contains antibacterial components that may be used in place of antibiotics. The results of this study confirm and advance our understanding of vinegar’s potential benefits for food safety and health.

Antimicrobial studies using the agar well diffusion method with grape vinegar of specific foods showed that when soaked in grape vinegar for seven days, the antimicrobial activities of garlic, ginger, onion, raw papaya, white radish, and green chilli were higher against specific gut microbes, including Bifidobacteriumdentium, Lactobacillus agilis, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus formosensia, and Aerococcussuis. According to this study, antimicrobial substances found in vinegar-extracted food could potentially replace antibiotics.

The results of this study add to our understanding of vinegar’s potential for both food safety and health benefits.The zone of inhibition of this study showed that green chilli, garlic, and onion had a moderate zone of inhibition against the Lactobacillus agilis bacteria. However, the antibacterial activity (10.9 mm) of raw papaya and grape extract against this bacterium was superior (Table 2; Fig. 2). Although both ginger and white radish inhibit Lactobacillus agilis within a 9 mm zone of inhibition. The results of the analysis show that there is a 10 mm zone of inhibition against Bifidobacteriumdentium in the grape vinegar extract, including raw papaya, green chilli, and onion (Table 2). While garlic and ginger had somewhat different zones of inhibition, measuring 10.4 mm and 10.2 mm, respectively, white radish has a 9.8 mm zone of inhibition against the same bacteria, Bifidobacteriumdentium, according to the data analysis (Table 2).

Table 2 shows that white radish, green chilli, and garlic have a 10.8 mm zone of inhibition against the same bacterium, Lactobacillus buchneri, while ginger and garlic have a 9 mm zone of inhibition. Based on the findings, the inhibition zone for Lactobacillus buchneri in raw papaya and raw onions is 10 mm and 9.8 mm, respectively (Table 2; Fig. 2). Table 2 shows that whereas green chilli has the largest zone of inhibition (10.9 mm) against Aerococcussuis, white radish, ginger, and garlic all have the same activity (10 mm) against this bacterium. According to Table 2, the raw papayaand onions have a minimal zone of inhibition of9 mm against Aerococcussuis.The findings in Table 2 show that although green chilli has a zone of inhibition of 10.6 mm against the same bacterium, Lactobacillus formosensia, raw papaya and onion have a zone of inhibition of 10 mm. According to Table 2 and Figure 2, the zones of inhibition for garlic and ginger against Lactobacillus formosensia are 9.9 mm and 9 mm, respectively. White radish has a 10.2 mm zone of inhibition against Lactobacillus formosensia, the same bacteria, according to the results.

Zone of inhibition of Grapes vinegar extract of different eatables: ginger, garlic, raw papaya, onion, green chilli, and white radish, and C denoted as grapes vinegar control against Lacto bacillusagilis plateA; Lactobacillus form osensis plate B;plate; Aerococcussuis plateC; respectively.

Qualitative analysis of vegetables treated and untreated with Grape vinegar

Conclusions:
Because grape vinegars are a rich source of numerous bioactive components, they can be utilised to cure a variety of illnesses, primarily those caused by free radicals. Both the grape type and the method of vinegar production have an impact on the composition of the very varied individual chemicals that make up grape vinegar. The findings of our investigation demonstrated that extracts of specific vegetables, including raw papaya, ginger, garlic, onion, white radish, and green chilli, contain a range of chemical components, including proteins, carbohydrates, alkaloids, phenols, and saponins, corroborating the claim that the vegetables have biological qualities like antibacterial activity. Given the widespread availability of these vegetables and the ease with which the extract may be prepared with the use of centrifugation, it may prove to be a practical and affordable substitute for current medications. Since natural products have a lower chance of negative effects, they are becoming more and more popular in the treatment and prevention of disease. Vegetables have a big impact on gut flora and are essential to a balanced diet. Through their ability to regulate gut flora, vegetables may help prevent and treat metabolic syndrome and other related conditions.

Acknowledgements: The authors express their gratitude to Krishna College of Science and Information Technology, Bijnor, which is affiliated with M.J.P. Rohilkhand University in Bareilly, U.P., India, for providing the facilities necessary to complete this work.

Conflict of Interests: The authors state that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

References:

1. Solieri, L.; Giudici, P. Vinegars of the world. In Vinegars of the World; Solieri, L., Giudici, P., Eds.; Springer: Milan, Italy, 2009; pp. 1–14. 
2. Advances in Vinegar Production, 1st ed; Bekatorou, A. (Ed.) CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; ISBN 9781351208475
3. Li, S.; Li, P.; Feng, F.; Luo, L.X. Microbial diversity and their roles in the vinegar fermentation process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 4997–5024
4. Bamforth, W. Vinegar. In Food, Fermentation and Micro-organisms; Blachwell Science: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 154–159
5. Hutchinson, U.F.; Jolly, N.P.; Chidi, B.S.; Ngongang, M.M.; Ntwampe, S.K.O. Vinegar Engineering: A Bioprocess Perspective. Food Eng. Rev. 2019, 11, 290–305.
6. Ozturk, I.; Caliskan, O.; Tornuk, F.; Ozcan, N.; Yalcin, H.; Baslar, M.; Sagdic, O. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, mineral, volatile, physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of traditional home-made Turkish vinegars. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 144–151
7. Mas, A.; Torija, M.J.; García-Parrilla, M.D.C.; Troncoso, A.M. Acetic acid bacteria and the production and quality of wine vinegar. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 394671.
8. AboNahas, H. H., Darwish, A. M., Abd El- Kareem, H. F., AboNahas, Y. H., Mansour, S. A., Korra, Y. H., et al. (2022). “Trust Your Gut: The Human Gut Microbiome in Health and Disease,” in Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis, eds R. Z. Sayyed and M. Khan (Singapore: Springer), 53–96. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16- 1626-6_3
9. Oliphant K., Allen-Vercoe E. Macronutrient metabolism by the human gut microbiome: major fermentation by-products and their impact on host health. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0704-8.
10. Scott K.P., Gratz S.W., Sheridan P.O., Flint H.J., Duncan S.H. The influence of diet on the gut microbiota. Pharmacol. Res. 2013; 69:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.10.020
11. Cianciosi D., Forbes-Hernández T.Y., Giampieri F., Zhang J., Ansary J., Pacetti M., Quiles J.L., Simal-Gandara J., Battino M. Effect of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion on the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of manuka honey. eFood. 2020;1(1):85–93. doi: 10.2991/efood.k.191011.001. 
12. Li Y., Jia X., Tang N., Tao H., Xia R., Cheng Y. Melanoidins, extracted from Chinese traditional vinegar powder, inhibit alcohol-induced inflammation and oxidative stress in macrophages via activation of SIRT1 and SIRT3. Food Funct. 2021;12(17):8120–8129. doi: 10.1039/d1fo00978h.
13. Zhang Y.J., Xie Q.T., You L.J., Cheung P.C.K., Zhao Z.G. Behavior of non-digestible polysaccharides in gastrointestinal tract: a mechanistic review of its anti-obesity effect. eFood. 2021;2(2):59–72. doi: 10.2991/efood.k.210310.001
14. Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Scott KP, Louis P. Interactions and competition within the microbial community of the human colon: links between diet and health. Environ Microbiol. 2007; 9:1101–11.
15. Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH, Webster LM, Holtrop G, Ze X, et al. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. ISME J. 2011; 5:220–30.
16. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473: 174–80. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature09944.
17. Kurokawa K, Itoh T, Kuwahara T, Oshima K, Toh H, Toyoda A, et al. Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes. DNA Res. 2007; 14: 169–81.
18. Simoes, C. D., Maganinho, M., and Sousa, A. S. FODMAPs, inflammatory bowel disease, and gut microbiota: Updated overview on the current evidence. Eur. J. Nutr. 2009, 61, 1187–1198. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02755-1
19. Piccioni, A., Cicchinelli, S., Valletta, F., De Luca, G., Longhitano, Y., Candelli, M., et al. Gut Microbiota and Autoimmune Diseases: A Charming Real World Together with Probiotics. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 3147–3159. doi: 10.2174/0929867328666210922161913
20. Singh J, Garg AP. Antimicrobial activities of untreated and grape vinegar-treated selected vegetables against common foodborne pathogens. J Biol Med 2023, 7(1): 001-007. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17352/jbm.000035
21. Singh J, Garg AP. Antimicrobial activity of Apple cider vinegar-treated selected vegetables against Common foodborne bacterial pathogens. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications.2022, 15:(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21786/bbrc15.2.13
22. Trease, G. E and Evans, WC. Pharmacognosy. Bailliere Tindall Ltd. London, 1978, Vol 11, Pages 78.